November 22, 2008, 04:50:42 AM
Home Help Search Logout
News: Thank you for registering with us! Please become an active member and introduce yourself.

+  Aquilus Vampire and Pagan Forum
|-+  General
| |-+  Dark Crypt
| | |-+  The Magnum Story - Animal Abuse in Kansas
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: The Magnum Story - Animal Abuse in Kansas  (Read 222 times)
ResplendentSeraphim
Kali Upasika Shakta
All Access Plus
Full Member
****

Karma: +20/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 201


« on: March 21, 2008, 11:43:56 AM »

This happened three years ago, but I thought it deserved attention for it brings up some issues that I think everyone can agree to being issues.  I think the harsher penalties have already passed, I will find an article on that later.




Quote from: Tim Carpenter, The Topeka Capital Journal

Animal abuse
Tim Carpenter Capital-Journal

Puppy's death spurs cruelty bills

Proposals would increase the penalties for animal abuse

The black puppy wagged his tail and licked the face of Heartland Animal Hospital manager Julie Breault.

But this wasn't a scene suitable for a Norman Rockwell painting.

The little dog, dubbed Magnum, was brought Aug. 1 to the Wichita clinic with wounds resulting from torture, she said. Patches of skin had been burned off with chemicals. Its front legs were wired together, cutting the flesh. One paw was stuffed into his mouth with suffocating effect. A leg was broken. Maggots squirmed in open wounds. He died five days later.

On Thursday, Breault came before the Senate Judiciary Committee to seek justice for Magnum.

"I want to give him a voice," she said. "He suffered terribly at the hands of these people. Make his life worth something."

No one has been charged with animal cruelty in the Wichita case, and if they are it would be a misdemeanor under state law.

Breault joined dozens of people in the room to request passage of Senate Bill 408, which would make each count of "intentionally or recklessly causing serious injury to any animal" a felony punishable with one year in jail.

Sen. Phil Journey, R-Haysville, offered the committee an alternative --- Senate Bill 402 --- that would keep the crime a misdemeanor but limit the one-year sentence to first-time offenders. A second conviction would carry a term of 23 months in prison followed by three years of post-release supervision. Anyone convicted would submit a DNA sample to the state and be listed on Kansas' register of violent offenders.

Journey said his version "deals with the offenders in a more comprehensive way to give the courts the tools necessary to hopefully prevent future violent acts against human beings or animals."

Brian Withrow, professor of criminology at Wichita State University, said the legislation had implications for animals and their owners. He said research links animal abuse to future violent behavior. The BTK serial killer Dennis Rader, of Park City, strangled dogs and cats before turning on people. He was sentenced last year to 10 life terms for torture-murders of 10 people.

"I'm asking to recognize animal abuse for what it is --- a serious crime warranting a serious response," Withrow said. "And, second, to recognize animal abuse for what it can be --- an indicator of a tendency to engage in higher levels of extreme human victimization."

The committee didn't act on either bill, but public pressure is building in the House and Senate to adopt a reform bill.

"There are an awful lot of people out there that really love animals," House Speaker Doug Mays, R-Topeka, said in an interview. "We're hearing from them."

Copyright 2006
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved.


Source: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4179/is_20060203/ai_n16228301




Sincerely,
ResplendentSeraphim
Logged

"Please do not spam me.  I am a vegetarian." --Me
Melissa
Site Owner
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +43/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1913



WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2008, 11:56:29 AM »

See here's my problem, if I ever saw anyone being cruel to any animal, I would be in jail!! LOL I could never work for the ASPCA as a cop. I would have a very hard time handling my emotions! lol There are many states that still look at animal cruelty as a misdemeanor. Which is really sad and not right. Some areas of the country don't even have the ASPCA cops that many of the big cities have. Which I think is also a shame. Many of these animals that are abused end of suffering a painful death or end up at the pound where they are put down, instead of attempting to give these animals a second chance of life if it's possible.

 While I was reading this, I was thinking strict laws should be in play here because there is a connection between animal cruelty and those who go on to hurt or kill humans. This exactly sums up what I was going to say:

Quote
Brian Withrow, professor of criminology at Wichita State University, said the legislation had implications for animals and their owners. He said research links animal abuse to future violent behavior. The BTK serial killer Dennis Rader, of Park City, strangled dogs and cats before turning on people. He was sentenced last year to 10 life terms for torture-murders of 10 people.

"I'm asking to recognize animal abuse for what it is --- a serious crime warranting a serious response," Withrow said. "And, second, to recognize animal abuse for what it can be --- an indicator of a tendency to engage in higher levels of extreme human victimization."


Logged

Endure, be the outcast, make the choice that no one else will. Make sure it's the right choice and don't give in.
ResplendentSeraphim
Kali Upasika Shakta
All Access Plus
Full Member
****

Karma: +20/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 201


« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2008, 12:01:49 PM »

I fully agree with you, and it is why I am an online member of the ASPCA.  When people say that animals are below humans, I always bring up the connection between cruelty toward animals and the transition from that to cruelty to human beings.  This is yet another reason why I got pushed toward wanting to get involved in forensic Psychology...or if it gets too competitive by the time I can apply to graduate school, I still do not mind getting involved in Clinical Social Work (which is very versatile) or FBI profiling.  I have seriously considered picking up a second major in Criminology.   

I have also considered looking into volunteer work for animal-friendly organizations for my community service requirements for one of my classes.  I think this issue is something that everyone should be aware of. 

As a note, it took a few years for me to stop crying whenever I see this in the news.  If you saw the pictures of Magnum, you would see why.  :-(



Sincerely,
ResplendentSeraphim
Logged

"Please do not spam me.  I am a vegetarian." --Me
Melissa
Site Owner
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +43/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1913



WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2008, 12:10:04 PM »

Hmm...no, I don't think I could handle the pictures. I had a hard time reading the description of what had been done to this poor puppy.
It's like the law they are trying to get passed in California. They want to make Pit Bulls illegal. And there was a bulletin that went through Myspace with pictures of Pit Bulls and Pit Bull puppies and people trying to stop this law from going into effect. I read that bulletin and cried. People never seem to never understand, there's no bad dogs, just bad owners!
Logged

Endure, be the outcast, make the choice that no one else will. Make sure it's the right choice and don't give in.
Poppy
All Access Plus
Hero Member
****

Karma: +41/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1183



« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2008, 01:54:06 PM »

The story absolutely sickened me. *sighs*
Logged

"A musician must make music, an artist must paint, a poet must write if he is to be ultimately at peace with himself. What one can be, one must be." - Abraham Moslow
ResplendentSeraphim
Kali Upasika Shakta
All Access Plus
Full Member
****

Karma: +20/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 201


« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2008, 03:28:45 PM »

Hmm...no, I don't think I could handle the pictures. I had a hard time reading the description of what had been done to this poor puppy.
It's like the law they are trying to get passed in California. They want to make Pit Bulls illegal. And there was a bulletin that went through Myspace with pictures of Pit Bulls and Pit Bull puppies and people trying to stop this law from going into effect. I read that bulletin and cried. People never seem to never understand, there's no bad dogs, just bad owners!

One big reason as to why I could never post the pictures.  The poor puppy got exploited enough by the people who abused it.  :-(

But yeah, I agree with you fully...there is no such thing as bad dogs, just bad owners!   To be honest, laws like that are like trying to ban depression without confronting the cause, if that makes any sense.  Aggressive pit bulls that reach the news are a result of bad owners, not the breed of the dog.  My family has a pet who is a mix of a chow and German Sheppard, two 'notorious' breeds...and it is the sweetest thing you would ever meet! 


Poppy:  I understand.  Fortunately, I think they managed to pass the laws that were proposed in the article just last year.   Once I can find the article that talks more about that, I will post it in this thread.   

EDIT: Here it is!  I had to find an article that kept the political party dispute out of the news. 


Quote from: KUJH

Bill protects neglected animals
Last updated May 02, 2006, 11:11 p.m.

The deliberate neglecting, torturing, and killing of animals is now a felony in the state of Kansas. The House approved the bill by a vote of 116 to seven. One day later the Senate approved the bill with flying colors 40 to zero. On April 17 Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius signed it, making it a law.

Now the deliberate maiming and torturing of animals will come with penalties of up to 30 days in jail and fines of up to $5,000. Almost nine years of lobbying the capitol and pushing the bill has paid off for the Lawrence Humane Society. The issue of animal rights is finally getting some notice.

...

Source: https://tv.ku.edu/news/2006/05/02/bill-protects-neglected-animals/


Sincerely,
ResplendentSeraphim
Logged

"Please do not spam me.  I am a vegetarian." --Me
undead_elf
All Access Plus
Hero Member
****

Karma: +16/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559



« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2008, 05:16:24 PM »

Hmm...no, I don't think I could handle the pictures. I had a hard time reading the description of what had been done to this poor puppy.
It's like the law they are trying to get passed in California. They want to make Pit Bulls illegal. And there was a bulletin that went through Myspace with pictures of Pit Bulls and Pit Bull puppies and people trying to stop this law from going into effect. I read that bulletin and cried. People never seem to never understand, there's no bad dogs, just bad owners!

I have a hard time looking at the pictures PETA puts out in their magazines. As for the animal abuse laws down here, I don't think a $500 fine and up to a year in jail are enough. Another thing that gets me: why is California trying to make it illegal to own a Pit-Bull? They need to go after the breeders who train the dogs to be the way they are considered to be now. I have friends who own Pits, and they are the most loving dogs who just love to play. Granted I wouldn't own one with small kids around, only because they do get rowdy when you play with them, but they don't go attacking everyone like you see on tv. They are trained to do that.
Logged
Melissa
Site Owner
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +43/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1913



WWW
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2008, 07:39:32 PM »

It's not the breeder. It's the owner! No reputable breeder would train puppies to be vicious.
Who they need to go after is the owners of dogs that are being trained this way. Because the owner is responsible for the dog's behavior. Not the breeder. The breeder is just that, they breed dogs. Once the dog is purchased, it's the owners responsibility. They also need to go after these sick idiots who have and encourage dog fights. If people are buying dogs from someone who is training dogs to be vicious, no matter what the breed, then the ASPCA needs to arrest that person.

I don't know if the bill passed in California, but it's because of people like Michael Vick and other idiots as to why they are pushing for Pit Bulls to be illegal. There's a law here that if you have a dog that is a Pit Bull or mixed Pit Bull or even resembles a Pit Bull, you must have at least $1000 insurance policy and the dog must be restrained at all times. Just because of the ignorance of some people. Also, do you realize that a lot of people can't tell the difference between a Pit Bull and some other breeds or mixed breeds of dogs cause they look similar?

http://www.pitbullsontheweb.com/petbull/findpit.html

And here's story out of Independence MO:
http://www.kmbc.com/news/9752235/detail.html?subid=22100413&qs=1;bp=t
Logged

Endure, be the outcast, make the choice that no one else will. Make sure it's the right choice and don't give in.
Raphael
Nemamial
All Access Plus
Hero Member
****

Karma: +32/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559



« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2008, 10:32:48 PM »

Here, if you already own a Pit bull you can keep it but it must be muzzled if it's outside.  New dogs cannot be bought or sold. Breeders will tell you that these dogs were only bread for one reason and it wasn't to be a family pet.
Logged

"There are no unnatural or supernatural phenomena, only very large gaps in our knowledge of what is natural. We should strive to fill those gaps of ignorance."
~ Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut,

You have the right to remain silent! 
Anything you say, will be misquoted and used against you!
SanguinLover
Domestic Dominatrix
All Access Plus
Full Member
****

Karma: +16/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 210


Clean cup, move down, move down!


WWW
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2008, 08:47:07 AM »

This is what the AKC has to say about bull Terriers:

http://www.akc.org/breeds/staffordshire_bull_terrier/history.cfm

Staffordshire Bull Terrier History 

The Staffordshire Bull Terrier had its beginnings in England many centuries ago when the Bulldog and Mastiff were closely linked. Bullbaiting and bearbaiting in the Elizabethan era produced large dogs for these sports and later on the 100-120 pound animal gave way to a small, more agile breed of up to 90 pounds.

Early in the 19th century the sport of dogfighting gained popularity and a smaller, faster dog was developed. It was called by names such as "Bulldog Terrier" and "Bull and Terrier." The Bulldog bred then was a larger dog than we know today and weighed about 60 pounds. This dog was crossed with a small native terrier which appears in the history of the present-day Manchester Terrier. The dog which this produced, averaging between 30 and 45 pounds, became the Staffordshire Bull Terrier.

James Hinks, in about 1860, crossed the Old Pit Bull Terrier, now known as the Staffordshire Bull Terrier, and produced the all-white English Bull Terrier. The Bull Terrier obtained recognition by The Kennel Club in England in the last quarter of the 19th century, but the Staffordshire Bull Terrier, due to its reputation as a fighting dog, did not receive this blessing.

In 1935 the Staffordshire Bull Terrier was recognized by the Kennel Club in England and enthusiasts were able to conduct conformation matches. The sport of dogfighting had long been made illegal and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier had evolved into a dog of such temperament as to make him a fine pet and companion and a worthy show dog.
Bull and Terrier breeds were believed to have arrived in North America sometime in the mid-1880's. Here they developed along different lines with a heavier, taller dog being the end result. Today's American Staffordshire Terrier represents that breeding.

The Staffordshire Bull Terrier was admitted to registration in the American Kennel Club Stud Book effective October 1, 1974, with regular show classification in the Terrier Group at AKC shows available on and after March 5, 1975.
Logged

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance" - Socrates
Pages: [1] Print 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!